|
When to Suspect Food Allergy
Food allergy is usually in the differential diagnosis when gastrointestinal symptoms are present but often overlooked in the diagnosis of other common conditions. Even in the context of celiac disease, when the putative allergen has been eliminated via compliance with a gluten-free diet, additional food allergies have been reported to complicate the clinical picture, thus suggesting the need for food allergy testing among diagnosed celiac patients1, 2. Yet peer reviewed reports indicate that IgE allergy testing (using RAST or ELISA methods) are unsatisfactory tools for identifying most food hypersensitivities. This is usually the case because food reactions are more often associated with delayed reactions3, 4. Further, 93% of patients with immediate reactions to foods also have delayed reactions to foods3. Delayed reactions would not be revealed through IgE testing. Hence, even patients with immediate type food allergies would benefit from testing for delayed immunological reactions to foods. IgG antibodies are correlated with gut inflammation and elevated numbers of alpha/beta intra epithelial lymphocytes4 which herald the presence of allergies to foods containing cereal grains. Medical investigators and clinicians are increasingly turning to IgG antibody testing to identify specific dietary allergens that individual patients should be avoiding for better control over their symptoms5, 6, 7, 8. Not only are IgG antibodies the most common of these immune proteins, they are highly sensitive to a variety of pathologies whether the target organ is the gut4, the cerebellum, or the peripheral nervous system5. Researchers report that IgG antibodies are likely to reflect a “local immune response of the gut” 4 thus giving rise to the growing preference for IgG food allergy testing. Some investigators report that in double blind studies IgG testing and strict dietary exclusion of the identified antigens has resulted in a 26% reduction in IBS symptoms6. These patients also showed significant reductions in non-colonic symptoms, including anxiety and depression, as well as improvements in measures of quality-of-life, among those who strictly complied with dietary exclusion of allergens as identified by IgG testing. Isolauri et al. call for further research into the dynamics of IgG mediated reactions based on the above findings7. They go on to suggest that IgG antibodies may play an important role in both IBS and food allergies because of the reported symptom reductions in IBS patients who comply with “elimination diets” based on IgG antibody testing. A wide variety of ailments have recently been reported in association with food allergies. From sleep disturbances3 to a range of neurological ailments9, 10 to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder11 to learning disabilities12 to psoriasis vulgaris13 and other autoimmune skin conditions 15, to asthma 8, food allergies are significantly overlooked as a contributing factor. And yet, dietary exclusion of IgG identified allergens consistently results in amelioration of symptoms in a majority of antibody-positive patients5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 14. Interestingly, high school students with multiple food allergies show significantly higher titers to intestinal microflora, suggesting increased intestinal permeability as a root cause at least in these cases of multiple food allergy15. Available data suggest a pathogenic mechanism in at least some cases of food allergy. Examination of the peer-reviewed epidemiological literature suggests a rate of gluten sensitivity in ~12% of the general population 5 and 22% of adults surveyed report that one or more foods causes them to feel ill16, most commonly cow’s milk and wheat. On the basis of this epidemiological data alone, testing for IgG food sensitivities should be ordered for at least every fifth patient visiting a general practice. However, these data are based on general population studies. The true rate of such food sensitivities is likely much higher among groups who are visiting a physician. Most of these patients will have some physical complaint so testing for food sensitivities should occur more commonly than the general prevalence. Therefore, more than one quarter of most groups of patients seen in a general practice would likely benefit from food allergy testing. Philip Putnam, M.D., of the Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Food Allergy Clinic, at the Cincinatti Children’s Hospital Medical Center, decries the years of delayed diagnosis, patient suffering, and the familial frustration often associated with food allergies3. He also details five cases in which parents were wrongly accused of Munchausen’s by proxy. These concerned parents of food-allergic children continued to request testing and further medical investigation for their children3. They apparently refused to be dismissed on the basis of their children’s negative skin test results. The current trend of increasing recognition of immunological reactions to foods, at the cellular level, suggests the need for increased clinical suspicion of IgG mediated food allergies17. Given the evidence, it may be reasonable to suggest that perhaps even a majority of patients visiting a general practitioner should be investigated for food allergies. References: Reprinted with permission by: Ron Hoggan and Immuno Laboratories, Inc. Partnering with Immuno Laboratories, Inc. Serving the world since 1978. 1.888.446.6866 Testing not available in New York state. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission prohibited. |